One difference is that you are using a 64 bit image, while mine is 32 bit (that's what "armhf" means, right?)
Anyway, do you know where the signatures are stored? What is it actually complaining about when it says the signatures aren't valid?
BTW, here's the (original) sources.list file (in the image):
I also changed it to this, but it didn't help:
Anyway, do you know where the signatures are stored? What is it actually complaining about when it says the signatures aren't valid?
BTW, here's the (original) sources.list file (in the image):
Code:
pi@Chroot:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.listdeb [ arch=armhf ] http://raspbian.raspberrypi.com/raspbian/ bookworm main contrib non-free rpi# Uncomment line below then 'apt-get update' to enable 'apt-get source'#deb-src http://raspbian.raspberrypi.com/raspbian/ bookworm main contrib non-free rpipi@Chroot:~$Code:
pi@Chroot:~$ cat /etc/apt/sources.list#deb [ arch=armhf ] http://raspbian.raspberrypi.com/raspbian/ bookworm main contrib non-free rpideb http://raspbian.raspberrypi.com/raspbian/ bookworm main contrib non-free rpi# Uncomment line below then 'apt-get update' to enable 'apt-get source'deb-src http://raspbian.raspberrypi.com/raspbian/ bookworm main contrib non-free rpipi@Chroot:~$Statistics: Posted by BigRedMailbox — Wed Dec 18, 2024 4:33 pm